Drug use and pretrial misconduct in New York city

Is recent drug use significantly associated with pretrial misconduct? Does consideration of recent drug use enhance risk classification among a sample of persons who have time free pending the disposition of their cases? Using data on arrestees in Manhattan, this paper examines these issues and some...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Smith, Douglas A. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Wish, Eric D. ; Jarjoura, G. Roger
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 1989
En: Journal of quantitative criminology
Año: 1989, Volumen: 5, Número: 2, Páginas: 101-126
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1767143494
003 DE-627
005 20230426082441.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210817s1989 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF01062519  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767143494 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767143494 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, Douglas A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Drug use and pretrial misconduct in New York city 
264 1 |c 1989 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Is recent drug use significantly associated with pretrial misconduct? Does consideration of recent drug use enhance risk classification among a sample of persons who have time free pending the disposition of their cases? Using data on arrestees in Manhattan, this paper examines these issues and some related questions. To measure recent drug use, urine samples were collected from persons shortly after their arrest and tested for four drugs: heroin, cocaine, PCP, and methadone. Two measures of pretrial misconduct are considered: whether a defendant fails to appear for a scheduled court date (FTA) and whether a defendant is rearrested prior to case disposition. Censored probit models are used to estimate the statistical association between drug test results and pretrial misconduct. Results show that drug test results are significantly associated with pretrial misconduct over and above the information typically available to judges at the time release decisions are made. Some implications of these findings for pretrial decision making are discussed. 
650 4 |a risk classification 
650 4 |a Pretrial misconduct 
650 4 |a Drug use 
650 4 |a censored probit 
700 1 |a Wish, Eric D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jarjoura, G. Roger  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of quantitative criminology  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1985  |g 5(1989), 2, Seite 101-126  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578003  |w (DE-600)2017241-2  |w (DE-576)104082321  |x 1573-7799  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1989  |g number:2  |g pages:101-126 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01062519  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF01062519  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3969411483 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767143494 
LOK |0 005 20210817061637 
LOK |0 008 210817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-08-16#CD4919971139F8E53AA5CC5766CEC048F4C08DC2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw