Look Who’s Talking: The Snitching Paradox in a Representative Sample of Prisoners

Snitching refers to conveying inside and potentially incriminating information about others to authorities. In contrast to prior criminological accounts of snitching, which rely on small and purposive samples, we used a probability sample of 802 male prisoners in Texas to study the status, prevalenc...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pyrooz, David C. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Decker, Scott H. 1950- ; Mitchell, Meghan M. ; Moule, Richard K, Jr
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: [2021]
En: The British journal of criminology
Año: 2021, Volumen: 61, Número: 4, Páginas: 1145-1167
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1767121431
003 DE-627
005 20210816154805.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210816s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/azaa103  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767121431 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767121431 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Pyrooz, David C.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1047263351  |0 (DE-627)777921375  |0 (DE-576)334866138  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Look Who’s Talking  |b The Snitching Paradox in a Representative Sample of Prisoners 
264 1 |c [2021] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Snitching refers to conveying inside and potentially incriminating information about others to authorities. In contrast to prior criminological accounts of snitching, which rely on small and purposive samples, we used a probability sample of 802 male prisoners in Texas to study the status, prevalence, acceptability and correlates of snitching. We arrive at several key quantitative findings. First, snitches are positioned at the bottom of the inmate hierarchy. Second, snitching is a rare behaviour (7.6 per cent) and even rarer identity (1.8 per cent), consistent with a snitching paradox. Third, about three-fourths of respondents endorsed contingencies where snitching was permissible, primarily those involving personal ties, self-protection, or violence prevention. Finally, characteristics such as age, civic engagement, education, gang status, and arrest and imprisonment history were associated with either snitching identity, behaviour, or contingencies. Snitching is a persistent feature of social life, yet violates a sacred norm central to many criminological theories, necessitating continued inquiry into its content, enforcement and consequences. 
650 4 |a snitching 
650 4 |a Prison 
650 4 |a convict code 
650 4 |a Norms 
650 4 |a Survey Research 
700 1 |a Decker, Scott H.  |d 1950-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)13320460X  |0 (DE-627)538275472  |0 (DE-576)16069275X  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mitchell, Meghan M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moule, Richard K, Jr  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960  |g 61(2021), 4, Seite 1145-1167  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271175559  |w (DE-600)1478955-3  |w (DE-576)079718906  |x 1464-3529  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:1145-1167 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa103  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3969365643 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767121431 
LOK |0 005 20231102094726 
LOK |0 008 210816||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo  |a tiep 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw