A trifactorial model of detection of deception using thermography

Most theories of detection of deception relate lying to three factors: (1) cognitive load, (2) subjective arousal, and (3) convincing impression. The evidence suggests that a higher temperature of the forehead is related to cognitive load, a lower temperature of the nose is associated with subjectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Gálvez-García, G. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Moliné, A. ; Albayay, J. ; Bascour-Sandoval, C. ; Boso, A. ; Fernández-Gómez, J. ; González-Quiñones, J. J. ; Gómez-Milán, E. ; Pérez-Luco, R.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2021
In: Psychology, crime & law
Jahr: 2021, Band: 27, Heft: 5, Seiten: 405-426
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1767081707
003 DE-627
005 20210816094620.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210816s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1815198  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767081707 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767081707 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Gálvez-García, G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A trifactorial model of detection of deception using thermography 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Most theories of detection of deception relate lying to three factors: (1) cognitive load, (2) subjective arousal, and (3) convincing impression. The evidence suggests that a higher temperature of the forehead is related to cognitive load, a lower temperature of the nose is associated with subjective arousal, and a higher temperature of the cheeks is related to convincing impression. Here, we took into account these three factors and, at the same time, associated the thermal change in specific facial regions of interest (ROIs) with each one of them. More importantly, we studied the combination of the thermal changes in the ROIs to establish the best combination to detect deception. Our results confirm an association between thermal changes in different ROIs and the three factors above. The best combination in the thermal changes of the ROIs for detecting deception (producing 83% accuracy and 13% false alarms in Experiment 1) is the one that was termed ‘at least two of the three ROIs’ where there is a lower temperature of the nose and/or a higher temperature of the cheeks and/or a higher forehead temperature. This finding constitutes an advance for detecting deception in multiple forensic contexts. 
650 4 |a Thermography 
650 4 |a Detection of deception 
650 4 |a facial temperature 
650 4 |a forensic assessment 
650 4 |a Subjective experience 
700 1 |a Moliné, A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Albayay, J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bascour-Sandoval, C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Boso, A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fernández-Gómez, J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a González-Quiñones, J. J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gómez-Milán, E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pérez-Luco, R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 27(2021), 5, Seite 405-426  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2021  |g number:5  |g pages:405-426 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1815198  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3969234182 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767081707 
LOK |0 005 20210816094620 
LOK |0 008 210816||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw