Examining the effect of case and trial factors on defense attorneys’ plea decision-making

Defense attorneys are attuned to the defendant’s likelihood of conviction at trial, based on the strength of the evidence, in forming their plea decisions. A higher threshold for conviction (i.e. unanimous jury verdict rule versus majority rule), could affect defense attorneys’ willingness to take c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Henderson, Kelsey S. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2021
In: Psychology, crime & law
Jahr: 2021, Band: 27, Heft: 4, Seiten: 357-382
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1767080360
003 DE-627
005 20210816093402.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210816s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1805744  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1767080360 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1767080360 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Henderson, Kelsey S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Examining the effect of case and trial factors on defense attorneys’ plea decision-making 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Defense attorneys are attuned to the defendant’s likelihood of conviction at trial, based on the strength of the evidence, in forming their plea decisions. A higher threshold for conviction (i.e. unanimous jury verdict rule versus majority rule), could affect defense attorneys’ willingness to take cases to trial. In this study, we examined defense attorney decision-making by presenting defense attorneys with a hypothetical case summary in which the jury verdict rule was unanimous versus majority rule (experiment one, N = 82), and the strength of the evidence was weak versus strong (experiment two, N = 81). In experiment one, there was no direct or indirect effect of jury verdict rule on plea decision-making. Rather, defense attorney estimates of the defendant’s likelihood of conviction predicted plea decisions; defense attorneys who perceived a higher likelihood of conviction were more likely to recommend plea bargaining than those who perceived a lower likelihood of conviction. In experiment two, strength of evidence influenced a number of defense attorney decisions. Defense attorneys in strong evidence conditions were more likely to recommend plea bargaining, rated the defendant’s likelihood of conviction higher, and their probability of winning at trial lower than those in weak evidence conditions. 
650 4 |a Plea Bargaining 
650 4 |a Shadow of trial 
650 4 |a defense attorneys 
650 4 |a jury verdict rule 
650 4 |a Strength of evidence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 27(2021), 4, Seite 357-382  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:357-382 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1805744  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 396923199X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1767080360 
LOK |0 005 20210816093402 
LOK |0 008 210816||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw