Taking the bait: interrogation questions about hypothetical evidence may inflate perceptions of guilt

During suspect interviews, police will sometimes ask about hypothetical incriminating evidence to evoke a cue to deception - a technique known as a bait question. Previous research has demonstrated such questions can distort peoples’ memory for what evidence exists in a case. Here, we investigate wh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Crozier, William E. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Luke, Timothy J. ; Strange, Deryn
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: Psychology, crime & law
Año: 2020, Volumen: 26, Número: 9, Páginas: 902-925
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1765993245
003 DE-627
005 20210810092119.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210810s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1742340  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1765993245 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1765993245 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Crozier, William E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Crozier, William E. 
245 1 0 |a Taking the bait  |b interrogation questions about hypothetical evidence may inflate perceptions of guilt 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a During suspect interviews, police will sometimes ask about hypothetical incriminating evidence to evoke a cue to deception - a technique known as a bait question. Previous research has demonstrated such questions can distort peoples’ memory for what evidence exists in a case. Here, we investigate whether such memory distortion can also cause people to see the suspect as more likely to be guilty. Across three experiments, we find exposure to bait questions led to participants hold inflated views of a suspect’s guilt. Further, we demonstrate bait questions cause reliable, robust memory distortion, leading participants to believe non-existent, incriminating evidence exists. However, we found no evidence to support the speculated mechanisms for this inflation - namely, (1) that source monitoring errors could lead people to misremember false evidence as real evidence and (2) that bait questions provide ‘key evidence’ to fill in the gaps of an incomplete theory of a case. In sum, bait questions have the problematic potential to shift jurors towards guilty verdicts. We suggest future research directions on bait questions, including the need for different designs to clarify why bait questions inflate guilt, and recommend practitioners avoid the use of bait questions. 
650 4 |a Memory distortion 
650 4 |a bait question 
650 4 |a Evidence 
650 4 |a guilt inflation 
650 4 |a Interrogation 
650 4 |a juror memory 
700 1 |a Luke, Timothy J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Strange, Deryn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 26(2020), 9, Seite 902-925  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2020  |g number:9  |g pages:902-925 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1742340  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3964170682 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1765993245 
LOK |0 005 20210810092119 
LOK |0 008 210810||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw