JUST: a measure of jury system trustworthiness

Three studies developed and tested a new measure of the perceived trustworthiness of the jury system, the 23-item Jury System Trustworthiness (JUST) scale, and assessed the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity. Study 1 assessed the scale’s factor structure and relation to other relevant cons...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Bornstein, Brian H. (Author) ; Miller, Monica K. (Author) ; Dellapaolera, Kimberly S. (Author) ; Hamm, Joseph A. (Author) ; Kleynhans, Amy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
In: Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2020, Volume: 26, Issue: 8, Pages: 797-822
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Attitudes
Mock Juries
Individual differences
Juror decision making
legal authoritarianism

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1765850614
003 DE-627
005 20210806094906.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210806s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1740222  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1765850614 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1765850614 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Bornstein, Brian H.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)140834044  |0 (DE-627)703802887  |0 (DE-576)26778242X  |4 aut 
109 |a Bornstein, Brian H.  |a Bornstein, Brian  |a Bornstein, B. H. 
245 1 0 |a JUST  |b a measure of jury system trustworthiness 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Three studies developed and tested a new measure of the perceived trustworthiness of the jury system, the 23-item Jury System Trustworthiness (JUST) scale, and assessed the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity. Study 1 assessed the scale’s factor structure and relation to other relevant constructs. In Studies 2 and 3, the JUST scale was administered to participants in two separate mock juror studies. The results of all three studies supported the hypothesized factor structure of the measure but showed that a simplified, 7-item measure was also effective. Overall, participants’ perceptions of juries were moderately positive, and the JUST scale was related to attitudes toward the police, authoritarianism, belief in a just world, juror bias, preference for a jury (vs. a bench) trial, and intention to respond to a jury summons. It also explained a unique portion of the variance in jury-specific beliefs and behavioral intentions, such as preference for a jury trial and response to a summons, beyond that accounted for by other legal attitudes. The JUST scale was not related to verdict decisions in either mock trial after controlling for authoritarianism. Several individual differences (e.g. age, race/ethnicity) were also related to attitudes toward the jury system. 
650 4 |a Attitudes 
650 4 |a Mock Juries 
650 4 |a Individual differences 
650 4 |a Juror decision making 
650 4 |a legal authoritarianism 
700 1 |a Miller, Monica K.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052131204  |0 (DE-627)787866962  |0 (DE-576)188717943  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dellapaolera, Kimberly S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hamm, Joseph A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kleynhans, Amy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 26(2020), 8, Seite 797-822  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2020  |g number:8  |g pages:797-822 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1740222  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3963359129 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1765850614 
LOK |0 005 20240423154017 
LOK |0 008 210806||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw