RT Article
T1 Who do you believe? Assessing student and community member perceptions of bystander and victim witnesses
JF Psychology, crime & law
VO 26
IS 8
SP 745
OP 767
A1 Jones, Angela M.
LA English
YR 2020
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1765849349
AB Eyewitness identifications provide critical evidence as they are often persuasive to jurors, but documented misidentifications have led to wrongful convictions . Researchers have examined how jurors evaluate multiple eyewitnesses, but not different types of eyewitnesses, such as bystanders and victims. Additionally, none of this research has examined jurors’ ability to evaluate bystander and victim identifications that vary in quality. Two studies examined student and community members’ perceptions of bystander and victim witnesses. Study 1 participants read about a good or poor-quality identification made by a bystander or victim. Study 2 participants read about both bystander and victim identifications that varied in quality. Both studies found jurors were sensitive to identification quality as demonstrated by a variety of legal decisions, including verdict, though the quality of a second identification in Study 2 did not change any legal decisions. Multiple differences between student and community member samples emerged across both studies suggesting that community members are more likely to trust witnesses and convict. Reliance on student samples may overestimate jurors’ ability to evaluate multiple eyewitnesses and underestimate the likelihood of conviction based on flawed eyewitness evidence.
K1 Bystander
K1 Eyewitness
K1 Eyewitness identification
K1 Juror decision making
K1 sample differences
DO 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1733570