Re-evaluating how to measure jurors’ comprehension and application of jury instructions

In order for jurors to decide a legally correct verdict, they must comprehend and apply jury instructions. To date, empirical research has focused on jurors’ comprehension of instructions. However, it is difficult to know how well jurors actually comprehend instructions, because the tests currently...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Baguley, Chantelle M. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Masser, Barbara M. ; McKimmie, Blake M.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
In: Psychology, crime & law
Jahr: 2020, Band: 26, Heft: 1, Seiten: 53-66
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:
Jury instructions
Application
Comprehension
judicial directions
Measurement
verdict accuracy
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In order for jurors to decide a legally correct verdict, they must comprehend and apply jury instructions. To date, empirical research has focused on jurors’ comprehension of instructions. However, it is difficult to know how well jurors actually comprehend instructions, because the tests currently used by researchers to measure jurors’ comprehension provide different estimates of jurors’ comprehension. It is also difficult to know the degree to which jurors apply instructions, because researchers have not directly examined this question. This article reviews the current tests used to measure jurors’ comprehension of instructions, and the current methods used to make inferences about jurors’ application of instructions. It then critically analyses these approaches, and recommends ways to improve these approaches in future research, to enable researchers to draw more precise conclusions about the quality of jurors’ decision-making.
ISSN:1477-2744
DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2019.1634195