Punishing for the Past (Sometimes): Judicial Perspectives on Criminal History Enhancements

Prior criminal record is routinely cited as one of the primary determinants of sentencing, and the common view is that prior record was a leading factor in non-guidelines jurisdictions going back decades. Yet, recent findings from a non-guidelines state failed to conform to this account. This study...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hester, Rhys (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
En: The prison journal
Año: 2021, Volumen: 101, Número: 4, Páginas: 443-465
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1765617901
003 DE-627
005 20210805061631.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210805s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/00328855211029663  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1765617901 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1765617901 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hester, Rhys  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hester, Rhys 
245 1 0 |a Punishing for the Past (Sometimes): Judicial Perspectives on Criminal History Enhancements 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Prior criminal record is routinely cited as one of the primary determinants of sentencing, and the common view is that prior record was a leading factor in non-guidelines jurisdictions going back decades. Yet, recent findings from a non-guidelines state failed to conform to this account. This study uses interviews with judges from a non-guidelines state to understand the role of prior record in sentencing in an unstructured sentencing state. This study also reexamines some of the early sentencing guidelines formation literature and finds some indications that pre-guidelines, prior record was not universally an instrumental predictor of sentence length. 
650 4 |a Criminal History 
650 4 |a Prior Record 
650 4 |a Sentencing Guidelines 
650 4 |a Sentencing 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The prison journal  |d London : Sage, 1921  |g 101(2021), 4, Seite 443-465  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324534272  |w (DE-600)2028491-3  |w (DE-576)096930292  |x 1552-7522  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:101  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:443-465 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211029663  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 396281468X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1765617901 
LOK |0 005 20210805061631 
LOK |0 008 210805||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-08-04#3F13F851E14B5A957519DDB8436B9D05C20E0108 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw