A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies

Numerous studies have addressed the question: Are African-Americans treated more harshly than similarly situated whites? This research employs meta-analysis to synthesize this body of research. One-hundred-sixteen statistically independent contrasts were coded from 71 published and unpublished studi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mitchell, Ojmarrh (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2005
In: Journal of quantitative criminology
Year: 2005, Volume: 21, Issue: 4, Pages: 439-466
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1764280253
003 DE-627
005 20230426140752.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210725s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764280253 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764280253 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mitchell, Ojmarrh  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Mitchell, Ojmarrh 
245 1 2 |a A Meta-Analysis of Race and Sentencing Research: Explaining the Inconsistencies 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Numerous studies have addressed the question: Are African-Americans treated more harshly than similarly situated whites? This research employs meta-analysis to synthesize this body of research. One-hundred-sixteen statistically independent contrasts were coded from 71 published and unpublished studies. Coded study and contextual features are used to explain variation in research findings. Analyses indicate that African-Americans generally are sentenced more harshly than whites; the magnitude of this race effect is statistically significant but small and highly variable. Larger estimates of unwarranted disparity are found in contrasts that examine drug offenses, imprisonment or discretionary decisions, do not pool cases from several smaller jurisdictions, utilize imprecise measures, or omit key variables. Yet, even when consideration is confined to those contrasts employing key controls and precise measures of key variables, unwarranted racial disparities persists. Further, a substantial proportion of variability in study results is explained by study factors, particularly methodological factors. 
650 4 |a Sentencing research 
650 4 |a Racial Discrimination 
650 4 |a Meta-analysis 
650 4 |a race and sentencing 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of quantitative criminology  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1985  |g 21(2005), 4, Seite 439-466  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578003  |w (DE-600)2017241-2  |w (DE-576)104082321  |x 1573-7799  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2005  |g number:4  |g pages:439-466 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 21  |j 2005  |e 4  |h 439-466 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957454409 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764280253 
LOK |0 005 20210725061653 
LOK |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#58313D2265AEDEA50CDCAA0F6E1F739A1703DF9C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw