Direct and Indirect Effects of Case Complexity, Guilty Pleas, and Offender Characteristics on Sentencing for Offenders Convicted of a White-Collar Offense Prior to Sentencing Guidelines

Previous research on the punishment of offenders convicted of a white-collar offense estimated models that specify only direct effects of defendant characteristics, offense-related variables, and guilty pleas on sentence severity. Drawing from conflict or labeling theories, much of this research foc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Albonetti, Celesta Ann (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1998
In: Journal of quantitative criminology
Jahr: 1998, Band: 14, Heft: 4, Seiten: 353-378
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1764279204
003 DE-627
005 20241231011304.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210725s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1023077704546  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764279204 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764279204 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |a Albonetti, Celesta Ann  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1047517973  |0 (DE-627)778503763  |0 (DE-576)16666667X  |4 aut 
109 |a Albonetti, Celesta Ann  |a Albonetti, Celesta A  |a Albonetti, C. A. 
245 1 0 |a Direct and Indirect Effects of Case Complexity, Guilty Pleas, and Offender Characteristics on Sentencing for Offenders Convicted of a White-Collar Offense Prior to Sentencing Guidelines 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Previous research on the punishment of offenders convicted of a white-collar offense estimated models that specify only direct effects of defendant characteristics, offense-related variables, and guilty pleas on sentence severity. Drawing from conflict or labeling theories, much of this research focused on the effects of offender's socioeconomic status on sentence outcomes. Findings from this research are inconsistent about the relationship between defendant characteristics and sentence severity. These studies overlook how differences in case complexity of white-collar offense and guilty pleas may intervene in the relationship between offender characteristics and sentence outcomes. This study seeks to contribute to an understanding of federal sentencing prior to the federal sentencing guidelines by testing a legal-bureaucratic theory of sentencing that hypothesizes an interplay between case complexity, guilty pleas and length of imprisonment. This interplay reflects the interface between the legal ramifications of pleading guilty, prosecutorial interests in efficiency and finality of case disposition in complex white-collar cases, and sentence severity. Using structural equation modeling, a four-equation model of sentencing that specifies case complexity and guilty pleas as intervening variables in the relationship between offender characteristics and length of imprisonment is estimated. Several findings are noteworthy. First, the hypothesized interplay between case complexity, guilty pleas, and sentence severity is supported. Second, the effect of offender's educational attainment on sentence severity is indirect via case complexity and guilty pleas. Third, offender's race and gender effect length of imprisonment both directly and indirectly through the intervening effect of case complexity and guilty pleas. These findings indicate the need to specify sentencing models that consider the direct and indirect effects of offender characteristics, offense characteristics, and guilty pleas on judicial discretion at sentencing. 
650 4 |a Structural equation model 
650 4 |a legal-bureaucratic model 
650 4 |a Federal sentencing 
650 4 |a length of imprisonment 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of quantitative criminology  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1985  |g 14(1998), 4, Seite 353-378  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578003  |w (DE-600)2017241-2  |w (DE-576)104082321  |x 1573-7799  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:1998  |g number:4  |g pages:353-378 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023077704546  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1023/A:1023077704546  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957453097 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764279204 
LOK |0 005 20210725061650 
LOK |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#80A6220D2290B2FC54907ECD16E885298F973464 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw