RT Article
T1 Appellate and trial court caseload growth: A pooled time-series-cross-section analysis
JF Journal of quantitative criminology
VO 3
IS 2
SP 143
OP 167
A1 Moody, Carlisle E.
A1 Marvell, Thomas B.
A2 Marvell, Thomas B.
LA English
YR 1987
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1764279026
AB This is an econometric study of factors behind filing growth since 1970 in state trial courts and, especially, appellate courts. The model posits two categories of variables: those affecting the supply of disputes and those affecting the costbenefit considerations of potential litigants. The study uses a pooled time-seriescross-section design and a fixed-effects regression procedure. The overall conclusion is that factors determining the supply of disputes overwhelm other factors entered in the model. At the trial level, economic conditions 2 years earlier strongly affect civil filings, and crime rates for the current and prior year have moderate impacts on criminal filings. The output capacity of trial courts, measured by the number of judges, has a strong impact on appeals. Economic conditions and trial court filings influence civil appeals in later years, and prison commitments influence criminal appeals. The great majority of cost-benefit factors, such as simplification of appellate procedure and interest-rate differentials, showed little or no impact on appeals.
K1 pooled time series-cross section
K1 econometric methods
K1 Economic Change
K1 Appeals
K1 Courts
DO 10.1007/BF01064213