Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis From a Non-Guidelines State

Objectives To test the liberation hypothesis in a judicial context unconstrained by sentencing guidelines. Methods We examined cross-sectional sentencing data (n = 17,671) using a hurdle count model, which combines a binary (logistic regression) model to predict zero counts and a zero-truncated nega...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Hester, Rhys (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Hartman, Todd K.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In: Journal of quantitative criminology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 33, Heft: 1, Seiten: 77-100
Online-Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1764278100
003 DE-627
005 20241231011302.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210725s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764278100 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764278100 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |a Hester, Rhys  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1154708136  |0 (DE-627)1016107803  |0 (DE-576)500582122  |4 aut 
109 |a Hester, Rhys 
245 1 0 |a Conditional Race Disparities in Criminal Sentencing: A Test of the Liberation Hypothesis From a Non-Guidelines State 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Objectives To test the liberation hypothesis in a judicial context unconstrained by sentencing guidelines. Methods We examined cross-sectional sentencing data (n = 17,671) using a hurdle count model, which combines a binary (logistic regression) model to predict zero counts and a zero-truncated negative binomial model to predict positive counts. We also conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to demonstrate that the hurdle count model provides unbiased estimates of our sentencing data and outperforms alternative approaches. Results For the liberation hypothesis, results of the interaction terms for race x offense severity and race x criminal history varied by decision type. For the in/out decision, criminal history moderated the effects of race: among offenders with less extensive criminal histories blacks were more likely to be incarcerated; among offenders with higher criminal histories this race effect disappeared. The race x offense severity interaction was not significant for the in/out decision. For the sentence length decision, offense severity moderated the effects of race: among offenders convicted of less serious crimes blacks received longer sentences than whites; among offenders convicted of crimes falling in the most serious offense categories the race effect became non-significant for Felony D offenses and transitioned to a relative reduction for blacks for the most serious Felony A, B, and C categories. The race x criminal history interaction was not significant for the length decision. Conclusions There is some support for the liberation hypothesis in this test from a non-guidelines jurisdiction. The findings suggest, however, that the decision to incarcerate and the sentence length decision may employ different processes in which the interactions between race and seriousness measures vary. 
650 4 |a Hurdle model 
650 4 |a Liberation Hypothesis 
650 4 |a Criminal Sentencing 
650 4 |a Racial Disparities 
650 4 |a Sentencing 
700 1 |a Hartman, Todd K.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of quantitative criminology  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1985  |g 33(2017), 1, Seite 77-100  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578003  |w (DE-600)2017241-2  |w (DE-576)104082321  |x 1573-7799  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:77-100 
856 |u http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/93378/1/libhyp.condaccept.v5.1.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/fulltext?id=doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9283-z  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20241001  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957451663 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764278100 
LOK |0 005 20210725061647 
LOK |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#EF0524B12735FC7DFB44526BBC0E99061AC765B5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw