A Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Criminological Panel Data
We demonstrate that fixed- and random-effects models for pooled cross-sectional and time series data, and latent growth curve models for panel data are special cases of a more general model. We compare the estimates obtained from each type of model for a data set consisting of homicide rates and a v...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Otros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2008
|
En: |
Journal of quantitative criminology
Año: 2008, Volumen: 24, Número: 1, Páginas: 51-72 |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Palabras clave: |
Sumario: | We demonstrate that fixed- and random-effects models for pooled cross-sectional and time series data, and latent growth curve models for panel data are special cases of a more general model. We compare the estimates obtained from each type of model for a data set consisting of homicide rates and a vector of explanatory variables for 400 US counties over a 15-year period. Most, but not all, estimates are similar in the two models. We identify circumstances under which one approach may be advantageous to the other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-7799 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10940-007-9038-y |