Examining Criminal Justice Practitioners’ Views on Collateral Consequences Policy

With the recent emphasis on reentry and the reintegration of offenders back into society, both academics and policy makers have voiced concern over both the process of applying collateral consequences in a particular case and the expanding number of collateral restrictions, some of which are quite s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goulette, Natalie (Author)
Contributors: Frank, James
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
In: American journal of criminal justice
Year: 2018, Volume: 43, Issue: 3, Pages: 724-744
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Criminal justice practitioners
Survey
Perceptions
Reentry
Collateral consequences

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 176427427X
003 DE-627
005 20210725061636.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210725s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12103-017-9423-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)176427427X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP176427427X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goulette, Natalie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Goulette, Natalie  |a Goulette, Natalie W. 
245 1 0 |a Examining Criminal Justice Practitioners’ Views on Collateral Consequences Policy 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a With the recent emphasis on reentry and the reintegration of offenders back into society, both academics and policy makers have voiced concern over both the process of applying collateral consequences in a particular case and the expanding number of collateral restrictions, some of which are quite severe. Many of these restrictions create significant barriers to reintegration for offenders released from incarceration. While reforms have been proposed, there is a lack of research examining the perceptions of criminal justice actors about collateral consequences of conviction. As parties most familiar with the application of consequences in cases, and the burdens they place on involved parties, the present study surveyed practitioners in a large Midwestern state. The findings suggest that judges, defense attorneys, probation and parole supervisors, and prosecutors are troubled by the role of collateral consequences in offender reentry and are not opposed to repealing or reforming some of these policies. Further, there are significant differences between practitioner groups as to reforms that should be implemented within the state’s criminal justice system. 
650 4 |a Criminal justice practitioners 
650 4 |a Survey 
650 4 |a Perceptions 
650 4 |a Reentry 
650 4 |a Collateral consequences 
700 1 |a Frank, James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 43(2018), 3, Seite 724-744  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2018  |g number:3  |g pages:724-744 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-017-9423-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/fulltext?id=doi:10.1007/s12103-017-9423-5  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957447135 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 176427427X 
LOK |0 005 20210725061636 
LOK |0 008 210725||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-24#AC5F2F71B6C1192B86BBC029E9568899C3F2B9B3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw