Guilty plea hearings and judicial supervision: Some differences between federal and state judges regarding Rule 11 and a defendant’s right to due process
Samples of 120 district court judges from six randomly selected circuit court jurisdictions were compared with 62 circuit and criminal court judges in Tennessee concerning their compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (U.S.C.A., 1986) governing guilty plea hearings. Among...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
1987
|
En: |
American journal of criminal justice
Año: 1987, Volumen: 12, Número: 1, Páginas: 62-81 |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Palabras clave: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1764207645 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210723061657.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 210723s1987 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02887539 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1764207645 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1764207645 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Champion, Dean J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Guilty plea hearings and judicial supervision: Some differences between federal and state judges regarding Rule 11 and a defendant’s right to due process |
264 | 1 | |c 1987 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Samples of 120 district court judges from six randomly selected circuit court jurisdictions were compared with 62 circuit and criminal court judges in Tennessee concerning their compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (U.S.C.A., 1986) governing guilty plea hearings. Among other things, Rule 11 provides that judges will inquire of defendants in open court about the voluntariness of their guilty pleas, whether they understand that they are waiving several important constitutional rights, whether there is a factual basis for the guilty plea, whether they realize they have a right to an attorney, and whether they understand the nature and consequences of the charges against them. It was found that federal judges are substantially in compliance with these provisions of Rule 11, although full compliance was not observed for all issue areas. By comparison, Tennessee trial judges adhered to these provisions (duplicated in the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure verbatim) much less frequently. Various reasons for these discrepancies are discussed, as are some implications for defendant’s access to due process and certain constitutional guarantees. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Tennessee Court | |
650 | 4 | |a Guilty Plea | |
650 | 4 | |a Plea Bargaining | |
650 | 4 | |a Court Judge | |
650 | 4 | |a Criminal Procedure | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of criminal justice |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975 |g 12(1987), 1, Seite 62-81 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)545782163 |w (DE-600)2387971-3 |w (DE-576)306834987 |x 1936-1351 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1987 |g number:1 |g pages:62-81 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887539 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02887539 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mkri | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3957032164 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1764207645 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210723061657 | ||
LOK | |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#E9A61624FBBAD97144B4B34B44990A1E58BF5FCD | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |