Dimensions of criminal justice policy: The Supreme Court, the Fourth Amendment and the trial court system

A full understanding of the role of the U.S. Supreme Court’s supervisory authority over the criminal justice process must recognize that the political and social environment affects local responses to Supreme Court directives. This paper reviews the development of Supreme Court Fourth Amendment deci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Stephens, Otis H. (VerfasserIn) ; Ungs, Thomas D. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1981
In: American journal of criminal justice
Jahr: 1981, Band: 6, Heft: 1, Seiten: 39-60
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764204506
003 DE-627
005 20210723061651.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02888327  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764204506 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764204506 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Stephens, Otis H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Dimensions of criminal justice policy: The Supreme Court, the Fourth Amendment and the trial court system 
264 1 |c 1981 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A full understanding of the role of the U.S. Supreme Court’s supervisory authority over the criminal justice process must recognize that the political and social environment affects local responses to Supreme Court directives. This paper reviews the development of Supreme Court Fourth Amendment decisions in which criminal court deliver justice. The authors suggest that future treatment of problems in Supreme Court’s supervisory role and the prospects of demands for Reform being generated from the larger political community. 
650 4 |a Supervisory Authority 
650 4 |a Supreme Court Decision 
650 4 |a Criminal Court 
650 4 |a Criminal Justice System 
650 4 |a Criminal Justice 
700 1 |a Ungs, Thomas D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 6(1981), 1, Seite 39-60  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:1981  |g number:1  |g pages:39-60 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888327  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02888327  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957029023 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764204506 
LOK |0 005 20210723061651 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#26CA0C0A24517EA06F8F7CF53231092E0E5E6DD8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw