The normative case for indigent defense systems

Today, every indigent person accused of a crime, where incarceration is a reasonably possible sentence, has the right to counsel apppointed by the State. From an historical perspective, this right is relatively new, since it has only evolved over the last 50 years and is the result of a variety of d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Snellenburg, Sidney C. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 1985
En: American journal of criminal justice
Año: 1985, Volumen: 10, Número: 1, Páginas: 22-40
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764204352
003 DE-627
005 20210723061651.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02888874  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764204352 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764204352 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Snellenburg, Sidney C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The normative case for indigent defense systems 
264 1 |c 1985 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Today, every indigent person accused of a crime, where incarceration is a reasonably possible sentence, has the right to counsel apppointed by the State. From an historical perspective, this right is relatively new, since it has only evolved over the last 50 years and is the result of a variety of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States. In essence, the States have developed three mechanisms to comply with these decisions: (1) Assigned Counsel Systems; (2) Contract Counsel Systems; and (3) Public Defender Systems. This paper (a) reviews the decisions applicable to indigents; (b) reviews existing indigent defense delivery systems; and (c) concludes that the independent State Public Defender Agency is the best system available from the perspectives of both the taxpayer and the defendant. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him: to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence (U.S. Constitution, Amendment VI). 
650 4 |a Public Defender 
650 4 |a Fourteenth Amendment 
650 4 |a State Court 
650 4 |a North Central Region 
650 4 |a Federal Court 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 10(1985), 1, Seite 22-40  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:1985  |g number:1  |g pages:22-40 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02888874  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02888874  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957028876 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764204352 
LOK |0 005 20210723061651 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#E0CB3BB0B9A405967B9068FE39CED466D5A158AE 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw