The use of discretion in prison disciplinary committees

Prison disciplinary committees are faced with the formal role responsibility of adjudicating disciplinary cases in an equitable manner and the informal role responsibility of supporting the authority of the staff members who file charges of rule violations by inmates. Analysis of 630 disciplinary ca...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Parton, David A. (Author) ; Stratton, John R. (Author) ; Shanahan, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 1987
In: American journal of criminal justice
Year: 1987, Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: 82-93
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1764204158
003 DE-627
005 20210723233036.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1987 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02887540  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764204158 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764204158 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Parton, David A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The use of discretion in prison disciplinary committees 
264 1 |c 1987 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Prison disciplinary committees are faced with the formal role responsibility of adjudicating disciplinary cases in an equitable manner and the informal role responsibility of supporting the authority of the staff members who file charges of rule violations by inmates. Analysis of 630 disciplinary cases reveal that dispositional decisions vary according to the number of charged rule violations and that the pattern of the dispositional decisions can be explained by role conflict but not by the thesis that the cases vary in terms of the adequacy of the evidence supporting blameworthiness. 
650 4 |a Minor Offense 
650 4 |a Formal Role 
650 4 |a Correctional Officer 
650 4 |a Rule Violation 
650 4 |a Role Conflict 
700 1 |a Stratton, John R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shanahan, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1019587296  |0 (DE-627)690961081  |0 (DE-576)358403936  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 12(1987), 1, Seite 82-93  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1987  |g number:1  |g pages:82-93 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887540  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02887540  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957028671 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764204158 
LOK |0 005 20210723061650 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#D32F3D283C454828FB9ACD0614D7222B97B3B294 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw