The United States Supreme Court and the death penalty since Furman: The settlement of basic issues

In 1972 the United States Supreme Court in Furman V. Georgia found that the death penalty as it was then being applied was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Furman provided few constitutional guidelines, but states re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Moore, Richter H. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Moore, Susan R.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1984
In: American journal of criminal justice
Jahr: 1984, Band: 9, Heft: 1, Seiten: 1-16
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764203461
003 DE-627
005 20210723061648.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1984 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF03373752  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764203461 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764203461 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Moore, Richter H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The United States Supreme Court and the death penalty since Furman: The settlement of basic issues 
264 1 |c 1984 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 1972 the United States Supreme Court in Furman V. Georgia found that the death penalty as it was then being applied was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Furman provided few constitutional guidelines, but states reinacted their death penalty statutes. In 1976 the Court began to receive appeals from death sentences imposed under the reinacted statutes. In its decisions the Court began to establish guidelines. It found the death penalty was not per se cruel and unusual punishment. Before the death penalty can be imposed the court must take into consideration any mitigating circumstances and the case must be reviewed by the state supreme court. A mandatory death sentence is unconstitutional. Other issues including proportionality, due process and finality of judgment will be examined in the next segment of this study. 
650 4 |a Capital Case 
650 4 |a Fourteenth Amendment 
650 4 |a Trial Judge 
650 4 |a United States Supreme 
650 4 |a Death Sentence 
700 1 |a Moore, Susan R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 9(1984), 1, Seite 1-16  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:1984  |g number:1  |g pages:1-16 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373752  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF03373752  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957027985 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764203461 
LOK |0 005 20210723061648 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#56CFC5CBD43E227418423910F53218C3D545BC23 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw