The Roberts Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment

An empirical examination of decisions by the Roberts Court can illuminate the contemporary Supreme Court’s impact on criminal justice. The Court’s decisions and the voting patterns of its justices confirm the Roberts Court’s generally conservative reputation with respect to criminal justice. However...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Christopher E. (Author)
Contributors: McCall, Madhavi M. ; McCall, Michael A.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
In: American journal of criminal justice
Year: 2015, Volume: 40, Issue: 2, Pages: 416-440
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764203402
003 DE-627
005 20210723061648.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12103-014-9271-5  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764203402 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764203402 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Smith, Christopher E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Roberts Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a An empirical examination of decisions by the Roberts Court can illuminate the contemporary Supreme Court’s impact on criminal justice. The Court’s decisions and the voting patterns of its justices confirm the Roberts Court’s generally conservative reputation with respect to criminal justice. However, contrary to commentators’ assertions about a five-member conservative majority actively reshaping criminal justice law in a rights-restricting fashion, the deeply-divided Court actually produces a notable number of rights-protective liberal decisions. Indeed, when the Roberts Court is most deeply divided on criminal justice issues, it has produced more liberal decisions than conservative decisions, due largely to the voting patterns of Justice Anthony Kennedy whose moderate voting record places him at the Court’s center. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas have also made important contributions to liberal decisions in divided cases. Generalizations about the Roberts Court’s conservatism and judicial activism in criminal justice are overstated without recognition of the voting patterns that have contributed to the production of rights-maintaining and rights-expanding liberal decisions. 
650 4 |a Criminal Procedure 
650 4 |a Roberts Court 
650 4 |a Constitutional Law 
650 4 |a Supreme Court 
700 1 |a McCall, Madhavi M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McCall, Michael A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 40(2015), 2, Seite 416-440  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2015  |g number:2  |g pages:416-440 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9271-5  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/fulltext?id=doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9271-5  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957027926 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764203402 
LOK |0 005 20210723061648 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#5A7EDD38C50C3A0B4BC4469347EEA9B2F3C2072E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw