Continuous versus Categorical Models of Delinquency Risk

Two groups of participants, one a nationally representative sample with roughly equal numbers of male and female participants ( N = 8,984) and the other a sample of mostly male adjudicated delinquents ( N = 1,354), were used to test whether risk factors for delinquency are organized continuously or...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Walters, Glenn D. 1954- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2014
En: American journal of criminal justice
Año: 2014, Volumen: 39, Número: 3, Páginas: 395-410
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Descripción
Sumario:Two groups of participants, one a nationally representative sample with roughly equal numbers of male and female participants ( N = 8,984) and the other a sample of mostly male adjudicated delinquents ( N = 1,354), were used to test whether risk factors for delinquency are organized continuously or categorically. A continuous (variable-centered) model was created using factor scores from a one-factor confirmatory factor analysis and a categorical (person-centered) model was constructed using posterior probabilities from a two-class finite mixture modeling analysis. In both samples the continuous model correlated significantly better with subsequent offending than did the categorical model, a finding that was replicated in males from both samples and in females from the nationally representative sample. The current findings suggest that risk factors are better construed as points along a continuum rather than as properties of distinct groups or types. These results further suggest that the etiology of offending, in the form of risk factors, is general/additive rather than specific/selective. The implications of these results for theory development, clinical practice, and future research are discussed.
ISSN:1936-1351
DOI:10.1007/s12103-013-9235-1