Evaluation of a computer-assisted monitoring (CAMO) project: Some measurement issues

This article investigates the effect of Computer Assisted Monitoring of Offenders (CAMO) on probation outcome. In a comparison sample, the effect of CAMO treatment is compared to the effect of “regular” probation. In addition to testing the effects of CAMO as an intermediate treatment, methodologica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Gould, Larry A. (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Archambeault, William G.
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1995
In: American journal of criminal justice
Jahr: 1995, Band: 19, Heft: 2, Seiten: 255-273
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764202392
003 DE-627
005 20210723061645.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02885918  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764202392 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764202392 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gould, Larry A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of a computer-assisted monitoring (CAMO) project: Some measurement issues 
264 1 |c 1995 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article investigates the effect of Computer Assisted Monitoring of Offenders (CAMO) on probation outcome. In a comparison sample, the effect of CAMO treatment is compared to the effect of “regular” probation. In addition to testing the effects of CAMO as an intermediate treatment, methodological issues, such as level of probation restrictiveness and the effects of prior criminal involvement on probation outcome, are tested. Although the results are mixed, they indicate that level of probation restrictiveness and prior criminal involvement have a greater effect on probation outcome than does CAMO. These findings have ramifications for researchers comparing CAMO probationers to “regular” probationers and for those comparing different CAMO programs. 
650 4 |a Recidivism Rate 
650 4 |a Criminal History 
650 4 |a Baton Rouge 
650 4 |a Probation Outcome 
650 4 |a Criminal Justice 
700 1 |a Archambeault, William G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 19(1995), 2, Seite 255-273  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:1995  |g number:2  |g pages:255-273 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885918  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02885918  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957026911 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764202392 
LOK |0 005 20210723061645 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#E2D2664B5FDBE10E82C6255D26DA4073FAE995E6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw