A Propensity Score Approach towards Assessing Neighborhood Risk of Parole Revocation

Previous research pertaining to parole has primarily concentrated on individual level characteristics as predictors of parole success, holding offender residency as a constant. Recently, there has been a growing realization that we need to understand how neighborhood contexts impact successful reint...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bensel, Tusty (Autor)
Otros Autores: Gibbs, Benjamin ; Lytle, Robert
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2015
En: American journal of criminal justice
Año: 2015, Volumen: 40, Número: 2, Páginas: 377-398
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Descripción
Sumario:Previous research pertaining to parole has primarily concentrated on individual level characteristics as predictors of parole success, holding offender residency as a constant. Recently, there has been a growing realization that we need to understand how neighborhood contexts impact successful reintegration. It is difficult to evaluate the increased risk associated with neighborhood characteristics on parole revocation because residency after prison is not randomly assigned. Consequently, methodological adaptations must be made to account for selection into disadvantaged neighborhoods. To reduce overt bias, we used two propensity score strategies, matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting, to determine the impact of parolee residence on parole outcome. Our analytic strategies indicated a weaker effect for neighborhood context when compared to traditional models. In essence, we found that both techniques were effective at decreasing the threat to internal validity allowing for greater confidence in reporting an average treatment effect. The implications of our findings are discussed as well as the utility of these analyses in criminal justice research.
ISSN:1936-1351
DOI:10.1007/s12103-014-9269-z