Why Not Let Kids Be Kids? An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship Between Alternative Rationales for Managing Status Offending and Youths’ Self-Concepts

Show other versions (1)

Over the past several decades, the juvenile justice system has struggled with an effective response to status offenders and their unwanted behaviors. Three divergent rationales have emerged for handling these youth: (1) treatment, (2) deterrence, and (3) normalization. Using data from over 300 youth...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jennings, Wesley G. (Author)
Contributors: Gibson, Chris ; Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2009
In: American journal of criminal justice
Year: 2009, Volume: 34, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 198-212
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
juvenile justice
Treatment
Delinquency
Status Offenders
Description
Summary:Over the past several decades, the juvenile justice system has struggled with an effective response to status offenders and their unwanted behaviors. Three divergent rationales have emerged for handling these youth: (1) treatment, (2) deterrence, and (3) normalization. Using data from over 300 youth under supervision by agencies in three states, the current study assesses how these differing practices are related to youths’ self-concepts. Results provide support for both deterrence and normalization-based rationales over the historical treatment-based rationale. Viewing status offending as normal adolescent behavior (i.e., normalization) has the most beneficial effect on self-concept. Study limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
ISSN:1936-1351
DOI:10.1007/s12103-008-9054-y