The United States Supreme Court and the death penalty: The struggle for fairness

In the ten years since Furman v. Georgia , the United States has recognized the right of states to adopt and follow different capital sentencing schemes so long as they protect the defendant from arbitrary and capricious imposing of the death sentence. The sentence may not be disproportionate to the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Moore, Richter H. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 1986
In: American journal of criminal justice
Jahr: 1986, Band: 10, Heft: 2, Seiten: 178-204
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764200098
003 DE-627
005 20210723061641.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s1986 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02887469  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764200098 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764200098 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Moore, Richter H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The United States Supreme Court and the death penalty: The struggle for fairness 
264 1 |c 1986 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the ten years since Furman v. Georgia , the United States has recognized the right of states to adopt and follow different capital sentencing schemes so long as they protect the defendant from arbitrary and capricious imposing of the death sentence. The sentence may not be disproportionate to the crime. Sentencing may be done by a judge or jury. Prospective jurors may not be challenged for cause merely because their deliberations would be affected because a death penalty was possible, but only if they could not fulfill their oath. Habeas corpus petitions in capital cases are not open invitations to avoid finality of judgment and execution of the sentence, but are to find constitutional errors. 
650 4 |a Fourteenth Amendment 
650 4 |a Trial Judge 
650 4 |a United States Supreme 
650 4 |a Death Sentence 
650 4 |a Death Penalty 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 10(1986), 2, Seite 178-204  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:1986  |g number:2  |g pages:178-204 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887469  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02887469  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957024617 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764200098 
LOK |0 005 20210723061641 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#40843EF97AF232EBBDE73290B14B65FF3E4716A8 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw