Invalid test of the proximity hypothesis in the Scandinavian panel study of penal attitudes

Based on data for three participating countries in the Scandinavian study of public sense of justice, Balvig et al. (2015) conclude that data support the proximity hypothesis. They admit, however, that additional information about sanctions given to respondents might have influenced the results, and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olaussen, Leif Petter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: European journal of criminology
Year: 2021, Volume: 18, Issue: 4, Pages: 547-565
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1764062906
003 DE-627
005 20210721134415.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210721s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1477370819854183  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764062906 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764062906 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Olaussen, Leif Petter  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-627)1236746511  |0 (DE-576)166746517  |4 aut 
109 |a Olaussen, Leif Petter  |a Olaussen, Leif P. 
245 1 0 |a Invalid test of the proximity hypothesis in the Scandinavian panel study of penal attitudes 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Based on data for three participating countries in the Scandinavian study of public sense of justice, Balvig et al. (2015) conclude that data support the proximity hypothesis. They admit, however, that additional information about sanctions given to respondents might have influenced the results, and suggest a new study without such information. The Norwegian part of the Scandinavian study complies with their wish. Analysis of these data and the films we used in the study do not support the proximity hypothesis because mock-trial films crucial for testing of the hypothesis are biased in favour of it. Balvig et al. (2015) were not aware of this methodological problem built into the Scandinavian study. 
650 4 |a Bias 
650 4 |a Scandinavian 
650 4 |a proximity hypothesis 
650 4 |a Public sense of justice 
650 4 |a Punitiveness 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004  |g 18(2021), 4, Seite 547-565  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)379048256  |w (DE-600)2135314-1  |w (DE-576)112775543  |x 1741-2609  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:547-565 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477370819854183  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3956627210 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764062906 
LOK |0 005 20210721134415 
LOK |0 008 210721||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw