Exceptional states: The political geography of comparative penology

It is now common in the sociology of punishment to lament that comparative penology has not matured as an area of research. While there have been seminal works in the comparative canon, their conceptual tools tend to be drawn from grand narratives and macro-structural perspectives. Comparative resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Brangan, Louise (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: [2020]
In: Punishment & society
Jahr: 2020, Band: 22, Heft: 5, Seiten: 596-616
Online-Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1761876023
003 DE-627
005 20210705111056.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210705s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1462474520915995  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1761876023 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1761876023 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Brangan, Louise  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Brangan, Louise 
245 1 0 |a Exceptional states  |b The political geography of comparative penology 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is now common in the sociology of punishment to lament that comparative penology has not matured as an area of research. While there have been seminal works in the comparative canon, their conceptual tools tend to be drawn from grand narratives and macro-structural perspectives. Comparative researchers therefore lack concepts that can help capture the complexity of penality within a single nation, limiting the cross-national perspective. Why is this relative lack of comparative refinement still the case? This article investigates this question by looking specifically at penal exceptionalism, a concept central to comparative penology. While punitiveness as a comparative and descriptive category has been critiqued, its converse, penal exceptionalism remains prevalent but undertheorised. Examining exceptionalism reveals that it is not merely the macro-structural approach to comparison that has limited the development of cross-national sociology of punishment, but the Anglocentric assumptions, which are the bedrock of comparative penology. In this essay, I argue that penal exceptionalism versus punitiveness is an Anglocentric formulation. These taken-for-granted assumptions have become so central to the comparative enterprise that they act as a barrier to developing new innovative comparative frameworks and concepts. The article concludes by suggesting some methodological strategies that are intended as a way of helping comparative penology to expand its toolkit and support the ongoing development of more equitable criminological knowledge. 
650 4 |a comparative imprisonment 
650 4 |a Comparative penology 
650 4 |a penal exceptionalism 
650 4 |a Penal politics 
650 4 |a Sociology of punishment 
650 4 |a Southern Criminology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 22(2020), 5, Seite 596-616  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2020  |g number:5  |g pages:596-616 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1462474520915995  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474520915995  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3944858506 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1761876023 
LOK |0 005 20210705111056 
LOK |0 008 210705||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw