‘Three warnings and you’re out’: Banishment and precarious penality in South Africa’s informal settlements

This paper asks how punitive forms of non-state punishment play out on the margins of the state, in informal (shack) settlements in South Africa. My focus is on the practice of forcing those who are suspected of certain offences to leave their homes in informal settlements. I refer to this as ‘banis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Super, Gail (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2020, Volume: 22, Issue: 1, Pages: 48-69
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Banishment
non-state punishment
precarious penality
Vigilantism
Violence

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1761698605
003 DE-627
005 20210701090529.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210701s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1462474518822485  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1761698605 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1761698605 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Super, Gail  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1044534419  |0 (DE-627)772118485  |0 (DE-576)397907109  |4 aut 
109 |a Super, Gail 
245 1 0 |a ‘Three warnings and you’re out’  |b Banishment and precarious penality in South Africa’s informal settlements 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper asks how punitive forms of non-state punishment play out on the margins of the state, in informal (shack) settlements in South Africa. My focus is on the practice of forcing those who are suspected of certain offences to leave their homes in informal settlements. I refer to this as ‘banishment’ and argue that it is a ‘penal phenomenon’ which is intimately tied to the general precarity that residents experience on a daily basis. The paper examines the ways in which these formally illegal, but nonetheless legitimate practices, draw on and reconfigure liberal state punishment. I use my study to make a broader theoretical point about the interplay between lawful state punishment and unlawful punishment on the periphery of the state. The blurred boundaries between legal (state) violence and illegal (but nonetheless legitimate) violence are particularly ‘visible’ in situations of ‘precarious penality’ - a term that I use to describe the unstable, violent and exclusionary penality that manifests in situations of socio-economic precarity, particularly in contexts of inequality, high rates of violent crime and a delegitimated rule of law. In these circumstances ‘non-state’ punishment contributes to the construction and maintenance of group boundaries and fulfils a similar function to ‘formal’ punishment. Thus, I ask whether it makes sense to exclude ‘non-state’ public authorities which act against ‘criminality’, when asking what or who constitutes the penal field and, when measuring state punitiveness? 
650 4 |a Banishment 
650 4 |a non-state punishment 
650 4 |a precarious penality 
650 4 |a Vigilantism 
650 4 |a Violence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 22(2020), 1, Seite 48-69  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:48-69 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474518822485  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3942839660 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1761698605 
LOK |0 005 20210701090529 
LOK |0 008 210701||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw