The Conflict Sensitivity Principle: Can Best Practice in Conflict Research Fill the Ethics Gap in Terrorism and Counterterrorism Research Practice?

This article explores how best practice in conflict research can address some of the key gaps and limitations of the terrorism research field with regards to research ethics. It draws from conflict research literature, as well as the authors’ primary research experience in Fragile and Conflict-Affec...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harris, Alistair (Author)
Contributors: Almeida, Manuel Castro
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Terrorism and political violence
Year: 2021, Volume: 33, Issue: 2, Pages: 381-396
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1752575490
003 DE-627
005 20210326061532.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210326s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09546553.2021.1880159  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1752575490 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1752575490 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Harris, Alistair  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Conflict Sensitivity Principle: Can Best Practice in Conflict Research Fill the Ethics Gap in Terrorism and Counterterrorism Research Practice? 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article explores how best practice in conflict research can address some of the key gaps and limitations of the terrorism research field with regards to research ethics. It draws from conflict research literature, as well as the authors’ primary research experience in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States (FCAS) and in the policy-oriented field of Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE). The analysis focuses on “conflict sensitivity” and the methodological approaches that have been developed and refined under the framework of that principle, including Systems Conflict Analysis. We seek to demonstrate how the integration of research methods related to conflict sensitivity represents an appropriate and fitting research agenda, through which relevant limitations of terrorism research can be addressed. This research agenda emphasizes, among other aspects, the need for solid primary research grounded in a detailed understanding of the local context, a departure from the narrow understanding of the Do No Harm principle in terrorism research, and a greater awareness about the relationship between research ethics and research methods. 
650 4 |a target audience analysis 
650 4 |a systems conflict analysis 
650 4 |a conflict sensitivity 
650 4 |a conflict studies 
650 4 |a preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) 
650 4 |a terrorism research 
650 4 |a ethical conduct of research 
650 4 |a research ethics 
700 1 |a Almeida, Manuel Castro  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Terrorism and political violence  |d London : Cass, 1989  |g 33(2021), 2, Seite 381-396  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349234795  |w (DE-600)2080322-9  |w (DE-576)113563507  |x 1556-1836  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:381-396 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1880159  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3894697946 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1752575490 
LOK |0 005 20210326061532 
LOK |0 008 210326||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-03-25#3EC30F3782222E026BF26D7E29D162A334BAA2A9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw