Expanding desistance theories through the integration of offender strategies

Existing theories of desistance can be loosely divided into two perspectives: socio-situational theories identify how life-course events and the social environment facilitate desistance, while subjective theories focus on individual differences in achieving desistance. Although both groups of theori...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Williams, Gemma C. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Schaefer, Lacey
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
En: Journal of crime and justice
Año: 2021, Volumen: 44, Número: 1, Páginas: 16-32
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1750798042
003 DE-627
005 20210309233942.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210309s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0735648X.2020.1782248  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1750798042 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1750798042 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Williams, Gemma C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Expanding desistance theories through the integration of offender strategies 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Existing theories of desistance can be loosely divided into two perspectives: socio-situational theories identify how life-course events and the social environment facilitate desistance, while subjective theories focus on individual differences in achieving desistance. Although both groups of theories receive empirical support, socio-situational frameworks are criticised for neglecting the processes which underpin them, while subjective explanations are criticised for overlooking the influence of opportunity structures in restricting offender agency. The current study aims to bridge this theoretical gap by inserting an action element of desistance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 53 probationers and parolees, asking them about their experiences with supervision and their efforts to comply with their order and desist from crime. A thematic analysis of the data uncovered four purposive actions that the participants use to avoid reoffending: (1) isolation, (2) knifing off antisocial peers, (3) prosocial activities and associations, and (4) getting clean. Our participants cited parenting and conventional goals as their main motivating factors, while the barriers to their desistance strategies included labelling, order conditions, and unemployment. Based on their reflections of their efforts to go straight, we suggest that desistance strategies mediate (ex-)offenders’ motivation to desist and the structural conditions imposed upon them. 
650 4 |a desistance strategies 
650 4 |a Community Corrections 
650 4 |a Desistance 
700 1 |a Schaefer, Lacey  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1084031728  |0 (DE-627)848239059  |0 (DE-576)415876621  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of crime and justice  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1984  |g 44(2021), 1, Seite 16-32  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)654743452  |w (DE-600)2599262-4  |w (DE-576)352346353  |x 2158-9119  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:16-32 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2020.1782248  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 44  |j 2021  |e 1  |h 16-32 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3882947047 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1750798042 
LOK |0 005 20210309061535 
LOK |0 008 210309||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-03-08#E33A2926E2A99A50448D93A485B0FD76122EE86F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw