Open comparisons of social services in Sweden—Why, how, and for what?

Open Comparisons is a soft power governance method using data collected from the municipalities for benchmarking their activities. Open Comparisons in Sweden may have different national goals, such as to measure quality, policy development and democratic openness. The overall aim of this paper is to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trygged, Sven 1957- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
In: Cogent social sciences
Year: 2017, Volume: 3, Issue: 1
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1747803634
003 DE-627
005 20230426111233.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210209s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/23311886.2017.1404735  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1747803634 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1747803634 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Trygged, Sven  |d 1957-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)139273514  |0 (DE-627)609463675  |0 (DE-576)310980119  |4 aut 
109 |a Trygged, Sven 1957- 
245 1 0 |a Open comparisons of social services in Sweden—Why, how, and for what? 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Open Comparisons is a soft power governance method using data collected from the municipalities for benchmarking their activities. Open Comparisons in Sweden may have different national goals, such as to measure quality, policy development and democratic openness. The overall aim of this paper is to describe and analyze the use of Open Comparisons to monitor the social welfare services—social assistance, child and youth care, and treatment of alcohol and drug abuse. Four focus group interviews were carried out with professionals from eight municipalities. Results show that Open Comparisons measures the technical quality of activities by reviewing what is available, such as routines and agreements, but says little about trickle down to client level. The findings are discussed in a wider context of overall goals of Open Comparisons related to soft power governance and governmentality which includes how the social services may internalize this way of thinking. 
650 4 |a Governmentality 
650 4 |a Organizational Development 
650 4 |a Social Services 
650 4 |a soft power governance 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cogent social sciences  |d London : Taylor & Francis, 2015  |g Volume 3 (2017), issue 1, article 1404735  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)823090892  |w (DE-600)2818173-6  |w (DE-576)429351739  |x 2331-1886  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2017  |g number:1 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1404735  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1404735  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3850117308 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1747803634 
LOK |0 005 20210209084311 
LOK |0 008 210209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw