Professional methods of assessments in architectural design projects: A focus on the relevant parametric measures in selected Nigerian universities

In Architecture, Engineering and other allied professional fields, the methods of assessment has for some decades been parametric. In an effort to carry out assessment for the grading of design works, the students have in many ways been confronted with bias, fear, intimidation, uncertainty, and mist...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aderonmu, P. A. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Awoyera, P. O. ; Erebor, M. E. ; Sholanke, A. B.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2017
En: Cogent social sciences
Año: 2017, Volumen: 3, Número: 1
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1747397393
003 DE-627
005 20210204120057.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210204s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/23311886.2017.1328793  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1747397393 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1747397393 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Aderonmu, P. A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Professional methods of assessments in architectural design projects  |b A focus on the relevant parametric measures in selected Nigerian universities 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Architecture, Engineering and other allied professional fields, the methods of assessment has for some decades been parametric. In an effort to carry out assessment for the grading of design works, the students have in many ways been confronted with bias, fear, intimidation, uncertainty, and mistrust from peers, studio teacher-instructors, observers, professional jurors, and other stakeholders involved within the process. The research employed a multi-stage stratified purposive sampling technique in which questionnaire responses were analysed using SPSS with regression analysis. The analysis was used for observations, focus group, and oral interviews. In this study, assessment of parameters and methods of grading employed in the Architectural Design Jury with specific reference to four (4) selected universities in Nigeria was made. Several factors militating against the conduct and ethics of the jury methods were also identified. The results revealed key findings in the four selected schools and each performed differently in terms of some significantly relevant parametric factors such as the Jury Review and Format, the Jury Purpose, Hierarchy and its Inherent Pedagogies, the Jury Objectives and Parameters and the Jury Prospects. The engagement of these parametric measures would empower architecture students, jurors, architect-designers, engineers, educators, builders and other allied professionals to make robust and meaningful decisions to attain design satisfaction for the clients and end-users. From the analysis, a dialogically comprehensive parametric process was identified as fit to proffer pragmatic solutions to address trivialities of the problem and is able to fix in answers to related design issues. 
650 4 |a Architecture 
650 4 |a Assessment 
650 4 |a Built environment 
650 4 |a design studio 
650 4 |a dialogical assessment 
650 4 |a Jury 
650 4 |a Professional 
700 1 |a Awoyera, P. O.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Erebor, M. E.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sholanke, A. B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cogent social sciences  |d London : Taylor & Francis, 2015  |g Volume 3 (2017), issue 1, article 1328793  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)823090892  |w (DE-600)2818173-6  |w (DE-576)429351739  |x 2331-1886  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2017  |g number:1 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1328793  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1328793  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3848710250 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1747397393 
LOK |0 005 20210204120057 
LOK |0 008 210204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw