Clarifying the Contours of the Police Legitimacy Measurement Debate: a Response to Cao and Graham
With the emergence of police legitimacy as a major indicator of good policing, scholars have continued to push our conceptual understanding of this construct. In recent years, a debate has emerged about whether four factors—lawfulness, procedural justice, distributive justice, and effectiveness—are...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2019
|
| En: |
Asian journal of criminology
Año: 2019, Volumen: 14, Número: 4, Páginas: 309-335 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
| Sumario: | With the emergence of police legitimacy as a major indicator of good policing, scholars have continued to push our conceptual understanding of this construct. In recent years, a debate has emerged about whether four factors—lawfulness, procedural justice, distributive justice, and effectiveness—are possible sources of legitimacy judgments (Tyler in Annual Review of Psychology 57, 375-400, 2006) or actual components of legitimacy (Tankebe in Criminology 51, 103-135, 2013). My goal in the present paper is review the contours of this debate. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-014X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11417-019-09300-4 |