Punishment and Human Dignity: sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America
A new conception of justice in punishment is needed that is premised on respect for offenders’ human dignity. It needs to acknowledge retributive and utilitarian values and incorporate independently important values of fairness and equal treatment. Punishment principles, policies, and practices line...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| En: |
Crime and justice
Año: 2018, Volumen: 47, Número: 1, Páginas: 119-157 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1743535171 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201223102850.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201223s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1086/696948 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1743535171 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1743535171 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tonry, Michael H. |d 1954- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)112629741 |0 (DE-627)691155380 |0 (DE-576)16440743X |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Tonry, Michael H. 1954- |a Tonry, M. 1954- |a Tonry, Michael 1954- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Punishment and Human Dignity |b sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A new conception of justice in punishment is needed that is premised on respect for offenders’ human dignity. It needs to acknowledge retributive and utilitarian values and incorporate independently important values of fairness and equal treatment. Punishment principles, policies, and practices lined up nicely in mid-twentieth-century America. Utilitarian principles implied a primary goal of crime prevention through rehabilitation and avoidance of unnecessary suffering by offenders. Judges and parole boards were empowered to tailor decisions to fit offenders’ circumstances and interests. Corrections officials sought to address rehabilitative needs and facilitate achievement of successful, law-abiding lives. The system often did not work as it should, but its ideals, aspirations, and aims were clear. In our time, there are no commonly shared principles; sentencing laws and practices are unprecedentedly rigid and severe; judges and parole boards often lack authority to make sensible or just decisions; corrections officials are expected simultaneously to act as police officers, actuaries, and social workers; and injustice is ubiquitous. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Crime and justice |d Chicago, Ill. [u.a.] : Univ. of Chicago Press, 1979 |g 47(2018), 1, Seite 119-157 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)477533175 |w (DE-600)2174153-0 |w (DE-576)272712507 |x 2153-0416 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:119-157 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/696948 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3828360211 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1743535171 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201223102850 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201223||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Justice | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Punishment | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Offenders | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Human dignity | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Conception | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Sentencing | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Sentencing laws | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
