RT Article
T1 Reinventing Community Corrections
JF Crime and justice
VO 46
IS 1
SP 27
OP 93
A1 Cullen, Francis T. 1951-
A2 Mears, Daniel P. 1966-
A2 Jonson, Cheryl Lero
LA English
YR 2017
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1743528728
AB Community corrections in the twenty-first century faces three challenges: how to be an alternative to imprisonment, how to be a conduit for reducing recidivism, and how to do less harm to offenders and their families and communities. Community corrections will reduce imprisonment only if its use is viewed as a legitimate form of punishment and is incentivized, which involves subsidizing the use of community sanctions and making communities pay to imprison offenders (e.g., a cap-and-trade system). To reduce recidivism, it will be necessary to hold officials accountable for this outcome, to ensure that evidence-based supervision is practiced, to use technology to deliver treatment services, and to create information systems that can guide the development, monitoring, and evaluation of interventions. Doing less harm—avoiding iatrogenic effects—will require nonintervention with low-risk offenders, reducing the imposition of needless constraints on offenders (i.e., collateral consequences), and creating opportunities for offenders to be redeemed.
K1 Community corrections
K1 USA
K1 Imprisonment
K1 Alternative
K1 Reduction
K1 Recidivism
DO 10.1086/688457