The Constitutional Deficiencies of the German 'Rechtsgutslehre'
This paper questions the theoretical merits and constitutional validity of the “Rechtsgutslehre” (doctrine of the protection of legal goods), a widely held doctrine about the limits of legitimate criminalization in Germany and some other jurisdictions. The immediate cause for this reassessment is a...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2013
|
| En: |
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Año: 2013, Volumen: 3, Número: 1, Páginas: 31-41 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1743367201 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230427215720.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201221s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15496/publikation-52648 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 7 | |a 10900/111272 |2 hdl | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1743367201 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1743367201 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 360 |
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stuckenberg, Carl-Friedrich |d 1964- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123192196 |0 (DE-627)082402639 |0 (DE-576)177485787 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Stuckenberg, Carl-Friedrich 1964- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Constitutional Deficiencies of the German 'Rechtsgutslehre' |c Carl-Friedrich Stuckenberg |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper questions the theoretical merits and constitutional validity of the “Rechtsgutslehre” (doctrine of the protection of legal goods), a widely held doctrine about the limits of legitimate criminalization in Germany and some other jurisdictions. The immediate cause for this reassessment is a recent decision of the German constitutional court which upheld the German incest prohibition and simultaneously rejected the traditional “Rechtsgutslehre” as constitutionally irrelevant, thereby stirring up considerable controversy among academic criminal lawyers. The paper tries to show why the court’s view is correct by pointing out the main deficiencies of the doctrine and what criteria a better theory must fulfil. | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4062801-2 |0 (DE-627)106130129 |0 (DE-576)209146168 |a Verfassungsrecht |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4215788-2 |0 (DE-627)105054402 |0 (DE-576)210227044 |a Kriminalisierung |2 gnd |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rechtsgutlehre | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Drug offences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ultima Ratio | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011 |g 3(2013), 1, Seite 31-41 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718614828 |w (DE-600)2661059-0 |w (DE-576)365227927 |x 2079-5971 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2013 |g number:1 |g pages:31-41 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-52648 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://hdl.handle.net/10900/111272 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3827951984 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1743367201 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201221131034 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201221||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21 |c DE-627 |d DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x Download, Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen, 2020 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a opus |a krim | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
