Managing rehabilitation: negotiating performance accountability at the frontlines of reentry service provision

Based on a three-year ethnographic study of two prisoner reentry agencies, this article explores how frontline service providers negotiate the contradictory demands of performance accountability. Performance accountability systems—collectively known as the New Public Management (NPM)—force service p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Halushka, John (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In: Punishment & society
Jahr: 2017, Band: 19, Heft: 4, Seiten: 482-502
Online-Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1743174101
003 DE-627
005 20201218085759.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201218s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1462474516669356  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1743174101 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743174101 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Halushka, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Managing rehabilitation  |b negotiating performance accountability at the frontlines of reentry service provision 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Based on a three-year ethnographic study of two prisoner reentry agencies, this article explores how frontline service providers negotiate the contradictory demands of performance accountability. Performance accountability systems—collectively known as the New Public Management (NPM)—force service providers to make difficult trade-offs between these managerial goals and the substantive goals of rehabilitation. However, we know little about how frontline service providers negotiate these competing demands. I show how, despite efforts to develop distinct organizational brands, both organizations I studied responded to performance pressures and resource constraints according to a set of practices I call “defensive institutionalism.” This involved strategies designed to protect organizational resources from high risk clients by (1) filtering the client pool and (2) responsibilizing clients. While these practices allowed these organizations to reconcile managerial and substantive goals in situ, they did not resolve the underlying contradictions of New Public Management. New Public Management incentivizes service providers to pursue short-term, individuated approaches to rehabilitation, and it induces isomorphism rather than innovation. I conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for current efforts to implement “evidence-based” criminal justice policies. 
650 4 |a New Public Management 
650 4 |a evidence-based practice 
650 4 |a Performance accountability 
650 4 |a Prisoner re-entry 
650 4 |a Rehabilitation 
650 4 |a Responsibilization 
650 4 |a Smart-on-crime 
650 4 |a Workforce development 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 19(2017), 4, Seite 482-502  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:482-502 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474516669356  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3827000602 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743174101 
LOK |0 005 20201218085759 
LOK |0 008 201218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw