New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies

Criminology has been slow to open up a conversation about decarceration and abolition in comparison with other disciplines, including history, geography, and gender, race, and critical ethnic studies. Scholars from these areas and actors on the ground—close up to confinement—have done most of the or...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brown, Michelle (Author)
Contributors: Schept, Judah Nathan
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2017, Volume: 19, Issue: 4, Pages: 440-462
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1743173806
003 DE-627
005 20201218085436.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201218s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1462474516666281  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1743173806 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743173806 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Brown, Michelle  |d 1971-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)140246649  |0 (DE-627)70361388X  |0 (DE-576)316053260  |4 aut 
109 |a Brown, Michelle 1971- 
245 1 0 |a New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Criminology has been slow to open up a conversation about decarceration and abolition in comparison with other disciplines, including history, geography, and gender, race, and critical ethnic studies. Scholars from these areas and actors on the ground—close up to confinement—have done most of the organizing against mass incarceration and theorizing of alternative possibilities. Why those experiences—and the theoretical traditions that inform their work—have been less recognized and developed in criminology is of pivotal concern as more criminologists move forward with the political project of decarceration. The extent to which criminology can sustain an alternative or abolitionist politics remains an open question. Amid growing conversations about decarceration and shifting rhetorics on punishment, we address some of the obstacles that limit criminology as a site from which to engage the abolitionist project, asking where criminologists might turn for interventionist models that move away from imprisonment and the violence of the carceral state. In this article, we advocate for and discuss the contours of critical carceral studies, a growing interdisciplinary movement for engaged scholarly and activist production against the carceral state. We discuss the imperatives for criminological engagement with critical carceral studies and sketch some of the terrain on which the discipline can contribute to the project, including important work to counter criminological discourses and knowledge production that reify and reproduce carceral logics and practices. 
650 4 |a Abolition 
650 4 |a carceral state 
650 4 |a Criminology 
650 4 |a Critical carceral studies 
650 4 |a Decarceration 
700 1 |a Schept, Judah Nathan  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1081518383  |0 (DE-627)846225379  |0 (DE-576)377891509  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 19(2017), 4, Seite 440-462  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:440-462 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474516666281  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 19  |j 2017  |e 4  |h 440-462 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3826999916 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743173806 
LOK |0 005 20201218085436 
LOK |0 008 201218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw