Sociological stalking? Methods, ethics and power in longitudinal criminological research
Scholarship on criminal careers and desistance from crime employing longitudinal methodologies has paid scant attention to sociological and anthropological debates regarding epistemology, reflexivity and researcher positionality. This is surprising in light of a recent phenomenological turn in desis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Criminology & criminal justice
Year: 2017, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 233-247 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1741003458 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201125094354.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201125s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1748895816669214 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1741003458 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1741003458 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sharpe, Gilly |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1018852859 |0 (DE-627)690703325 |0 (DE-576)316316725 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Sharpe, Gilly | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sociological stalking? Methods, ethics and power in longitudinal criminological research |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Scholarship on criminal careers and desistance from crime employing longitudinal methodologies has paid scant attention to sociological and anthropological debates regarding epistemology, reflexivity and researcher positionality. This is surprising in light of a recent phenomenological turn in desistance research wherein (former) lawbreakers’ identity, reflexivity and self-understanding have become central preoccupations. In this article I interrogate aspects of the methodological ‘underside’ of qualitative longitudinal research with criminalized women through an examination of the surveillant position of the researcher. Focusing on methods, ethics and power, I examine some contradictions of feminist concerns to ‘give women voice’ in research involving re-tracing an over-surveilled and highly stigmatized population. I reflect on the effects of researcher positionality through a conceptualization of re-tracing methods as, at worst, a form of sociological stalking. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminology & criminal justice |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006 |g 17(2017), 3, Seite 233-247 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)337806837 |w (DE-600)2063005-0 |w (DE-576)096290994 |x 1748-8966 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:233-247 |
| 856 | |u http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/106844/1/Sharpe%20Sociological%20Stalking%20final%20manuscript%2023.08.16.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895816669214 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3812143682 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1741003458 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201125094354 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Criminalized women | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Ethics | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Power | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Research methods | ||
| LOK | |0 689 |a s |a Surveillance | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||