Using compliance with probation supervision as an interim outcome measure in evaluating a probation initiative

This article addresses the issues involved in using compliance with probation supervision as an interim outcome measure in evaluation research. We address the complex nature of compliance and what it implies. Like much research on probation and criminal justice more generally, it was not possible to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sorsby, Angela (Author)
Contributors: Shapland, Joanna 1950- ; Robinson, Gwen 1969-
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
In: Criminology & criminal justice
Year: 2017, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 40-61
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1740987500
003 DE-627
005 20201125082751.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201125s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1748895816653992  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1740987500 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1740987500 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Sorsby, Angela  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Using compliance with probation supervision as an interim outcome measure in evaluating a probation initiative 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article addresses the issues involved in using compliance with probation supervision as an interim outcome measure in evaluation research. We address the complex nature of compliance and what it implies. Like much research on probation and criminal justice more generally, it was not possible to use random assignment to treatment and comparison groups in the case study we address, which evaluated the SEED training programme. We therefore compare two different data analysis methods to adjust for prior underlying differences between groups, namely regression adjustment of treatment covariates that are related to the outcome measure in the sample data and regression adjustment using propensity scores derived from a wide range of baseline variables. The propensity score method allows for control of a wider range of baseline variables, including those which do not differ significantly between the two groups. 
700 1 |a Shapland, Joanna  |d 1950-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)128568097  |0 (DE-627)376203390  |0 (DE-576)164873732  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Robinson, Gwen  |d 1969-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1076185819  |0 (DE-627)834534711  |0 (DE-576)179968106  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & criminal justice  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006  |g 17(2017), 1, Seite 40-61  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)337806837  |w (DE-600)2063005-0  |w (DE-576)096290994  |x 1748-8966  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:40-61 
856 |u http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/100493/16/WRRO_100493.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895816653992  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3812118572 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1740987500 
LOK |0 005 20201125082751 
LOK |0 008 201125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Compliance 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Corrections 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Methodology 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Probation 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Propensity scores 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw