Power and agency: characterisations of the female victim of family violence

This article explores the divergence between how female victims of family violence characterise themselves and how they are characterised by the police officers who respond to family violence incidents. It posits the socially constructed nature of female victimhood and how such constructions create...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Kent, Antonia (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2019
In: The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1737752263
003 DE-627
005 20201104120205.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201104s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0004865818794804  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1737752263 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1737752263 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kent, Antonia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Power and agency  |b characterisations of the female victim of family violence 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article explores the divergence between how female victims of family violence characterise themselves and how they are characterised by the police officers who respond to family violence incidents. It posits the socially constructed nature of female victimhood and how such constructions create totalising discourses which affect policy, community attitudes and even the self-perceptions of abused women. In the following study, Michael Halliday’s lexicogrammar theory was applied to public texts from the 2015 Royal Commission into Family Violence to facilitate an investigation into how the names given to the actors in discourse, and the verb processes used to describe the actions of those actors, contribute to the emergence of discourses on power and agency. Although these discourses are used to represent the power dynamics of family violence, they are revealed here to be at odds with the experiences of abused women, who named themselves and their capacity to act in a variety of different, often conflicting, ways. I conclude that new discourses need to be forged which better speak to women’s experiences of abuse and respond more effectively and sensitively to their needs. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology  |d London ˜[u.a.]œ : Sage Publ., 1968  |g 52(2019), 3, Seite 348-367  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)355118904  |w (DE-600)2089449-1  |w (DE-576)102554234  |x 1837-9273  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:52  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:348-367 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004865818794804  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 52  |j 2019  |e 3  |h 348-367 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3792130866 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1737752263 
LOK |0 005 20201104113133 
LOK |0 008 201104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Affected family members 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Agency 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Family violence 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Female victim characterisations 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Female victim narrative 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Police perceptions 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Power 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Victimhood perceptions 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw