The homosexual advance defence in Australia: an examination of sentencing practices and provocation law reform

In May 2015, the judgment of the High Court of Australia in Lindsay v The Queen reignited debate surrounding the use of the partial defence of provocation in cases involving a non-violent homosexual advance. Lindsay re-established the legal possibility that a man provoked enough to lose self-control...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology
Main Author: McGeary, Rebecca (Author)
Contributors: Fitz-Gibbon, Kate (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: [2018]
In:The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology
Year: 2018, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 576-592
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
LEADER 03301nab a22005172 4500
001 1737616033
003 DE-627
005 20201103103658.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201103s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0004865817749261  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1737616033 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1737616033 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a McGeary, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The homosexual advance defence in Australia  |b an examination of sentencing practices and provocation law reform 
264 1 |c [2018] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In May 2015, the judgment of the High Court of Australia in Lindsay v The Queen reignited debate surrounding the use of the partial defence of provocation in cases involving a non-violent homosexual advance. Lindsay re-established the legal possibility that a man provoked enough to lose self-control and commit lethal violence in response to a non-violent homosexual advance could be convicted of manslaughter by reason of provocation rather than murder. The judgment arrived in the midst of two decades of national law reform activity, whereby all Australian jurisdictions have either introduced or proposed reform to abolish or restrict the application of the controversial partial defence of provocation. In doing so, cases involving a homosexual advance defence are increasingly shifting to the realm of sentencing. This article offers a timely analysis of the sentencing of homosexual advance defence cases in New South Wales and Queensland. In doing so, it examines the judicial treatment of a defendant’s claim of a ‘special sensitivity’ to a homosexual advance, problems arising from the private nature of an alleged homosexual advance and the treatment of intoxication in sentencing. It reveals that reform of legal categories alone may not be sufficient in ensuring a just legal response to homicides incited by alleged homosexual advances. 
700 1 |a Fitz-Gibbon, Kate  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1116977990  |0 (DE-627)870783718  |0 (DE-576)17734475X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1968  |g 51(2018), 4, Seite 576-592  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)355118904  |w (DE-600)2089449-1  |w (DE-576)102554234  |x 1837-9273 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004865817749261  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 51  |j 2018  |e 4  |h 576-592 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
FUL |e http://localhost/cgi-bin/full_text_lookup?id=1737616033 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxnx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3791514687 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1737616033 
LOK |0 005 20201103103658 
LOK |0 008 201103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n  |8 0 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Homicide law 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Homosexual advance defence 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Law reform 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Partial defence of provocation 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Sentencing 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw