|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000naa a22000002 4500 |
001 |
1737616033 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20201103103658.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
201103s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1177/0004865817749261
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1737616033
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1737616033
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a McGeary, Rebecca
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The homosexual advance defence in Australia
|b an examination of sentencing practices and provocation law reform
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c [2018]
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a In May 2015, the judgment of the High Court of Australia in Lindsay v The Queen reignited debate surrounding the use of the partial defence of provocation in cases involving a non-violent homosexual advance. Lindsay re-established the legal possibility that a man provoked enough to lose self-control and commit lethal violence in response to a non-violent homosexual advance could be convicted of manslaughter by reason of provocation rather than murder. The judgment arrived in the midst of two decades of national law reform activity, whereby all Australian jurisdictions have either introduced or proposed reform to abolish or restrict the application of the controversial partial defence of provocation. In doing so, cases involving a homosexual advance defence are increasingly shifting to the realm of sentencing. This article offers a timely analysis of the sentencing of homosexual advance defence cases in New South Wales and Queensland. In doing so, it examines the judicial treatment of a defendant’s claim of a ‘special sensitivity’ to a homosexual advance, problems arising from the private nature of an alleged homosexual advance and the treatment of intoxication in sentencing. It reveals that reform of legal categories alone may not be sufficient in ensuring a just legal response to homicides incited by alleged homosexual advances.
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fitz-Gibbon, Kate
|e VerfasserIn
|0 (DE-588)1116977990
|0 (DE-627)870783718
|0 (DE-576)17734475X
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology
|d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1968
|g 51(2018), 4, Seite 576-592
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)355118904
|w (DE-600)2089449-1
|w (DE-576)102554234
|x 1837-9273
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:51
|g year:2018
|g number:4
|g pages:576-592
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004865817749261
|x Resolving-System
|3 Volltext
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 51
|j 2018
|e 4
|h 576-592
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 3791514687
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1737616033
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20201103103658
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 201103||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-21-110
|c DE-627
|d DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Homicide law
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Homosexual advance defence
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Law reform
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Partial defence of provocation
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 689
|a s
|a Sentencing
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-21-110
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a krub
|a krzo
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|