Lawyers’ question content and children’s responses in Scottish criminal courts

Differences between prosecutors and defense lawyers with respect to the centrality of the information sought and topic of the questions asked, and the effects on witnesses’ responses, were examined in 56 trial transcripts of 5- to 17-year-old children testifying as alleged victims of sexual abuse. O...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andrews, Samantha J. (Author)
Contributors: Lamb, Michael E.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
In: Psychology, crime & law
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Description
Summary:Differences between prosecutors and defense lawyers with respect to the centrality of the information sought and topic of the questions asked, and the effects on witnesses’ responses, were examined in 56 trial transcripts of 5- to 17-year-old children testifying as alleged victims of sexual abuse. Over 40% of all questions focused on peripheral content and defense lawyers asked more questions prompting peripheral information than prosecutors. Overall, children were more productive to questions that prompted central information than questions that prompted peripheral information, and to questions seeking information about actions rather than any other topic, particularly when prompted by prosecutors. However, children were less responsive, and expressed more uncertainty and self-contradictions in response to questions that prompted central information than peripheral information. Lawyers did not alter the centrality of the information sought or topic of their questions when prompting children of different ages. These findings suggest that the centrality of the information sought and question topic are important parameters to consider when evaluating children’s responses to different types of questions.
ISSN:1477-2744
DOI:10.1080/1068316X.2019.1611829