Innocent of the crime under investigation: suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies and statement-evidence inconsistency in strategic vs. non-strategic interviews

The study examines the counter-interrogation strategies applied by mock suspects (N = 94), who are innocent of a mock crime under investigation but who were present at the scene, for different reasons, at around the time the crime occurred. Half were present at the crime scene to carry out a lawful...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clemens, Franziska (Autor) ; Grolig, Tuule (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Psychology, crime & law
Año: 2019, Volumen: 25, Número: 10, Páginas: 945-962
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1736647741
003 DE-627
005 20250829094854.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201027s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2019.1597093  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1736647741 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1736647741 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Clemens, Franziska  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Innocent of the crime under investigation  |b suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies and statement-evidence inconsistency in strategic vs. non-strategic interviews 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The study examines the counter-interrogation strategies applied by mock suspects (N = 94), who are innocent of a mock crime under investigation but who were present at the scene, for different reasons, at around the time the crime occurred. Half were present at the crime scene to carry out a lawful act, the other half to carry out an unlawful act. Furthermore, this study examines the effect of the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique as a strategic interviewing technique (vs. a non-strategic technique), on suspects’ statement-evidence inconsistencies. Participants were randomly assigned to the two interview conditions (strategic vs. non-strategic) and were interviewed as suspects of a crime, which none of them had committed. The results show that the most commonly used counter-interrogation strategy in both groups was to be honest. However, 26.1% of the innocent suspects, performing an unlawful act, reported the strategy to be deceptive. In addition, the statements of suspects executing an unlawful act were significantly more inconsistent with the evidence in the strategic than the non-strategic interview condition. The increased statement-evidence inconsistency rates potentially put these suspects at risk of being assessed as guilty of a crime they did not commit. 
650 4 |a Strategic Use of Evidence technique 
650 4 |a Suspects’ counter-interrogation strategies 
650 4 |a Deception detection 
650 4 |a Innocent suspects 
650 4 |a Strategic interviewing 
700 1 |a Grolig, Tuule  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 25(2019), 10, Seite 945-962  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2019  |g number:10  |g pages:945-962 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org10.1080/1068316X.2019.1597093  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1597093  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3786647291 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1736647741 
LOK |0 005 20201027091641 
LOK |0 008 201027||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw