Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance
Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015. Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. Oxon: Routledge), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical...
Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2019, Volume: 25, Issue: 6, Pages: 641-658
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
|Journals Online & Print:|
|Check availability:||HBZ Gateway|
|Summary:||Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015. Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations. Oxon: Routledge), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical research. It begins by addressing definitional issues, before showing how various theories of desistance differently explain the phenomena of giving up crime. The article concludes by engaging with its limitations and relatively muted impact on policy and practice. It is argued that desistance research, and its interpretation in both policy and practice, remains very individualistic in focus, and often disconnected from specific analyses of the cultural and structural contexts in which both offending and desistance take place. In considering implications for future research, the article suggests that the desistance paradigm might be enhanced by attending to contemporary critiques of its limitations. In particular, this would suggest the application of intersectional methods and analyses, analyses of divergences in desistance pathways by crime type, enhanced critical and contextualizing analyses of cultural and structural influences on desistance, and, beyond individual desistance, a focus on the challenges of social integration for people with convictions, to better inform and shape penal policy and practice.|