Prison sentences: last resort or the default sanction?

This paper discusses the sentencing purposes for penal penalties, judges’ perceptions of sentencing purposes and prison sentences, and the effects of penal sanctions. We examine judges’ positions towards different penalties, with a focus on imprisonment, since their views on the different penalties...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Rodrigues, Andreia de Castro (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Gonçalves, Rui Abrunhosa ; Oliveira, Jorge Quintas de ; Sacau, Ana
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2019
In: Psychology, crime & law
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1736444417
003 DE-627
005 20201023092735.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201023s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1511788  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1736444417 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1736444417 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rodrigues, Andreia de Castro  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Prison sentences  |b last resort or the default sanction? 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper discusses the sentencing purposes for penal penalties, judges’ perceptions of sentencing purposes and prison sentences, and the effects of penal sanctions. We examine judges’ positions towards different penalties, with a focus on imprisonment, since their views on the different penalties are related to their sentencing decision-making. Understanding these views is then critical for several practical and political purposes, including bridging the gap between academic discourse and legal practice. We accessed judges’ views on penal sanctions through a questionnaire and an interview. Our sample is compounded by the judges of the criminal courts from the three major cities in Portugal. Despite the most recent criminological empirical knowledge, judges valued imprisonment as the most adequate sentence, both for different crimes and for different judicial purposes. This result is not consistent with viewing imprisonment as a ‘last resort’ solution. Indeed, we did not find this ‘last resort’ position in our data, and it is not apparent in the judicial statistics on imprisonment rates. Our data highlight the importance of increasing judges’ training on criminological and sociological issues as well as the importance of changing the influence of their personal beliefs regarding penal sanctions into research-based positions. 
650 4 |a Correctional effectiveness 
650 4 |a Judges’ accounts 
650 4 |a Penal sanctions 
650 4 |a Prisons 
650 4 |a Sentencing 
700 1 |a Gonçalves, Rui Abrunhosa  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)105656332X  |0 (DE-627)794815006  |0 (DE-576)412329077  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gonçalves, Rui Abrunhosa  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)105656332X  |0 (DE-627)794815006  |0 (DE-576)412329077  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Oliveira, Jorge Quintas de  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sacau, Ana  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 25(2019), 2, Seite 171-194  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:171-194 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1511788  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 25  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 171-194 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3785065086 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1736444417 
LOK |0 005 20201023092735 
LOK |0 008 201023||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw