The Mr. Big technique on trial by jury
Mr. Big is a Canadian undercover police technique used to elicit confessions. Undercover officers befriend the suspect, and gradually draw them into a fictitious criminal organization. Upon meeting the boss of the organization, ‘Mr. Big’, the suspect is pressured to confess. When evidence from the s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2019
|
| In: |
Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2019, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-22 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| LEADER | 02821naa a22005292 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1736440098 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20201023083954.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201023s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1483507 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1736440098 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1736440098 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Connors, Christina J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Mr. Big technique on trial by jury |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Mr. Big is a Canadian undercover police technique used to elicit confessions. Undercover officers befriend the suspect, and gradually draw them into a fictitious criminal organization. Upon meeting the boss of the organization, ‘Mr. Big’, the suspect is pressured to confess. When evidence from the sting operation, including the confession, is presented later in court, it may induce juror moral prejudice towards a defendant. We evaluated how situational and dispositional sting factors (crime task severity, financial incentive, and defendant intelligence) influence mock juror moral prejudice and decision-making in Mr. Big cases. Results from Experiment 1 (N = 270) showed fewer guilty verdicts in the high incentive conditions. In Experiment 2 (N = 1,666), high incentive and low defendant intelligence were related to fewer guilty verdicts, more favorable ratings of defendant character, and more skeptical evaluations of confession evidence. Additionally, there were differences between community and student participants on multiple outcomes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Mr. Big interrogation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a False confessions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jury decision-making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prejudice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Verdicts | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patry, Marc W. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Smith, Steven M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Psychology, crime & law |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994 |g 25(2019), 1, Seite 1-22 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341903574 |w (DE-600)2070124-X |w (DE-576)27234995X |x 1477-2744 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:1-22 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1483507 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 25 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 1-22 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3785053894 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1736440098 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201023083954 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201023||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||