Why call someone by what we don't want them to be? The ethics of labeling in forensic/correctional psychology

Labeling a person by their past behavior or a criminal conviction is commonplace throughout forensic and correctional psychology. Labels including ‘offender’ and ‘sex offender’ infiltrate academic writing and conference presentations, names of professional organizations and treatment programmes and,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Willis, Gwenda M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
In: Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2018, Volume: 24, Issue: 7, Pages: 727-743
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1736213210
003 DE-627
005 20201022092029.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201022s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1736213210 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1736213210 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Willis, Gwenda M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Why call someone by what we don't want them to be? The ethics of labeling in forensic/correctional psychology 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Labeling a person by their past behavior or a criminal conviction is commonplace throughout forensic and correctional psychology. Labels including ‘offender’ and ‘sex offender’ infiltrate academic writing and conference presentations, names of professional organizations and treatment programmes and, at times, traverse therapeutic work. That such labels are frequently used and rarely advocated against suggests that helping professionals either (i) don't recognize labeling as an ethical issue, or (ii) don't consider it their role to challenge. The current paper aims to encourage critical reflection on the use of labels in forensic and correctional psychology. Key concerns are illustrated through a focus on labels commonly assigned to individuals who have sexually abused, where labeling is especially prolific. The scope of labeling is reviewed, and implications for rehabilitation and reintegration discussed. Next, an analysis of the ethics of labeling individuals on the basis of criminal convictions, past behavior or psychological phenomena is presented. It is argued that the use of such labels contradict core ethical principles including beneficence and nonmaleficence, respect for the dignity of all persons, and responsibilities to society. A de-labelling movement for forensic/correctional psychology and related fields is proposed. 
650 4 |a Labeling theory 
650 4 |a Desistance 
650 4 |a Professional Ethics 
650 4 |a Pygmalion effect 
650 4 |a Rehabilitation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 24(2018), 7, Seite 727-743  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2018  |g number:7  |g pages:727-743 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421640  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2018  |e 7  |h 727-743 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3784381391 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1736213210 
LOK |0 005 20201022092029 
LOK |0 008 201022||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw