Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification

Eyewitness identifications made under poor witnessing or identification conditions have resulted in numerous wrongful convictions [National Registry of Exonerations. (2017). Retrieved January 28, 2017, from http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/ExonerationsContribFactorsByCrime.aspx]. T...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jones, Angela M. (Author)
Contributors: Penrod, Steven
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
In: Psychology, crime & law
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1736073214
003 DE-627
005 20201021150825.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201021s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1736073214 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1736073214 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Jones, Angela M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Improving the effectiveness of the Henderson instruction safeguard against unreliable eyewitness identification 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Eyewitness identifications made under poor witnessing or identification conditions have resulted in numerous wrongful convictions [National Registry of Exonerations. (2017). Retrieved January 28, 2017, from http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/ExonerationsContribFactorsByCrime.aspx]. These wrongful convictions have persuaded some courts to seek ways to improve admissibility standards concerning eyewitness identifications and jurors’ ability to discern the quality of identifications. New Jersey recently ruled that case-specific instructions must be presented to the jury to determine the reliability of an identification [New Jersey v. Henderson, 27 A.3d 872 (2011)]. Research suggests the original format of these instructions is ineffective [Dillon, M., Jones, A.M., Bergold, A.N., Hui, C., & Penrod, S. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of the Henderson eyewitness instructions. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. doi:10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964; Jones, A.M., Bergold, A.S., Dillon, M., & Penrod, S. (2017). Sensitizing jurors to factors influencing the accuracy of eyewitness identification: Assessing the effectiveness of the Henderson instructions. Journal of Experimental Criminology. doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9279-6]. Other studies have found one form of eyewitness instructions sensitized jurors to problematic police procedures [Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., Wise, R. A., & Holfeld, B. (2013). A teaching aid for improving jurors’ assessment of eyewitness accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 190-197], but no studies have found sensitivity to poor witnessing conditions. Therefore, the current study sought to modify Henderson instructions to improve sensitivity to variations in estimator variables. Jury-eligible community members read a trial transcript and rendered a verdict. Results indicated modified Henderson instructions increased sensitivity to estimator variables above and beyond a no-eyewitness-instruction control condition, while original Henderson instructions did not affect jurors’ decision making. Mounting evidence suggests original Henderson instructions are ineffective and may serve to induce confusion among jurors. However, more research is needed before courts consider this revised instruction. 
650 4 |a 2011 
650 4 |a Judicial instructions 
650 4 |a New Jersey v. Henderson 
650 4 |a Eyewitness identification 
650 4 |a Safeguard 
650 4 |a Wrongful convictions 
700 1 |a Penrod, Steven  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1219990167  |0 (DE-627)1736139282  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 24(2018), 2, Seite 177-193  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:177-193 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390113  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2018  |e 2  |h 177-193 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3783487307 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1736073214 
LOK |0 005 20201021092704 
LOK |0 008 201021||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw